Leadership in Public Administration: Which way to go?

dc.contributor.authorMoi., Edna J.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T13:13:04Z
dc.date.available2026-02-06T13:13:04Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractWhether performance in public administration is improving or not, it is not governments only concern, too much emphasis on performance distracts attention from organizational capacity and underlying government values. Thus caution should be exercised on sources of legitimacy based on authority used during recruitment of personnel. Different systems of authority attract different personnel who will perform or not. This paper discuses three sources of legitimacy for domination based on authority and their limitations: the charismatic authority, traditional authority and legal rationality.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2521-0793
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.mut.ac.ke/handle/123456789/6580
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Law, Humanities & Social Scienceen_US
dc.subjectCharismatic, legal-framework, system, tradition.en_US
dc.titleLeadership in Public Administration: Which way to go?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Leadership in Public Administration Which way to go.pdf
Size:
109.92 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: