| dc.description.abstract | Many Kenyan communities rely on nonformal justice systems for fairness
alongside established legal frameworks, but
face several challenges. There are also
concerns that some outcomes of these
alternative systems may violate human
rights and constitutional provisions. This
research aimed to explore the impact of
reconciliation, and mediation, on conflict
resolution in Isiolo County, grounded in
restorative justice theory. A descriptive
research design was used, targeting a
population of 1,600 individuals, including
Borana elders, council members, residents,
pastoralists, village elders, and the area
chief, with a sample size of 160 (10% of the
target population). Random and stratified
sampling were applied, and both
quantitative and qualitative data were
collected through questionnaires and
interviews. The data were analyzed using
the Statistical Package for Social Sciences
(SPSS), with both descriptive and
inferential statistics, including correlation
and regression analysis. The researcher
obtained permits from relevant authorities,
such as NACOSTI and the county director
of education. Participants were informed
about the study's purpose and guaranteed
anonymity, privacy, and confidentiality,
using pseudonyms when necessary. The
findings indicated that alternative justice
systems positively impact peace,
relationship restoration, and conflict
resolution. Community forums and
facilitated dialogues helped individuals’
express grievances and collaboratively seek
solutions. The study concluded that these
systems enhance social cohesion, build
trust, and prevent conflict escalation in
Isiolo County. Involving community elders
and the area chief in the resolution process
further strengthens these systems. The
study recommends that government
agencies collaborate with community
organizations and traditional leaders to
promote awareness of reconciliation,
mediation, and negotiation. | en_US |
