Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMuketha, Geoffrey M.
dc.contributor.authorGhani, A. A. A.
dc.contributor.authorAtan, R.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-21T19:28:44Z
dc.date.available2020-11-21T19:28:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-28
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Web Engineering, Vol 19 Iss 5-6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/JWE/article/view/5733
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4458
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.13052/jwe1540-9589.19566
dc.description.abstractBusiness process models tend to get more and more complex with age, which hurts the ease with which designers can understand and modify them. Few metrics have been proposed to measure this complexity, and even fewer have been tested in the Business Process Execution Language (BPEL) context. In this paper, we present three related experimental studies whose aim was to analyse the ability of four selected structural metrics to predict BPEL process model understandability and modifiability. We used Spearman’s rho and regression analysis in all three experiments. All metrics passed the correlation tests meaning that they can serve as understandability and modifiability indicators. Further, four of the metrics passed the regression test for understanding time implying that they can serve as understandability predictors. Finally, only one metric passed the regression test for modification time implying that it can serve as a modifiability predictor.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRiver Publishersen_US
dc.subjectBPEL processesen_US
dc.subjectbusiness process modelsen_US
dc.subjectweb servicesen_US
dc.subjectmetrics validationen_US
dc.subjectstructural complexityen_US
dc.subjectmodifiabilityen_US
dc.subjectunderstandabilityen_US
dc.titleValidating Structural Metrics for BPEL Process Modelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record