• Login
    View Item 
    •   MUT Research Archive
    • Journal Articles
    • School of Business & Economics (JA)
    • Journal Articles (BE)
    • View Item
    •   MUT Research Archive
    • Journal Articles
    • School of Business & Economics (JA)
    • Journal Articles (BE)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The choice of grass species to combat desertification in semi-arid Kenyan rangelands is greatly influenced by their forage value for livestock

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    The choice of grass species to combat desertification.pdf (495.7Kb)
    Date
    2013
    Author
    Nyariki, Dickson M.
    Mganga, K. Z.
    Musimba, N. K. R.
    Nyangito, M. M.
    Mwang'ombe, A. W.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Livestock production is the main source of livelihood in the arid and semi-arid lands in Africa. However, desertification characterized by vegetation degradation and soil erosion is a major threat to the sustainability of land-based production systems. Native rangeland forage species Cenchrus ciliaris L. (Buffel grass/African foxtail grass), Eragrostis superba Peyr. (Maasai love grass) and Enteropogon macrostachyus (Hochst. Ex A. Rich.) Monro ex Benth. (Bush rye grass) have been used to combat desertification. The objectives of the study were to identify the best-suited native grass species to combat desertification in a semi-arid environment in Kenya and to identify the preferred grass species among the agropastoralists in the area. Percentage basal cover, plant densities and frequencies of the three grasses in pure stands and mixtures were estimated. Grass species preferences were through household survey and focus group discussion. Results showed a significant difference (P < 0 05) in plant densities and cover estimates: E. macrostachyus was ranked first; C. ciliaris and E. superba were ranked second and third respectively. The agropastoral farmers, however, preferred E. superba followed by C. ciliaris and E. macrostachyus, a reverse trend. These results suggest that the choice of grass species to combat desertification is influenced more by its contribution as a source of forage for livestock than its contribution for rehabilitation purposes.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/226
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12089/abstract
    https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1016100073?and_facet_journal=jour.1053077
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259549399_The_choice_of_grass_species_to_combat_desertification_in_semi-arid_Kenyan_rangelands_is_greatly_influenced_by_their_forage_value_for_livestock
    https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1016100073?and_facet_journal=jour.1053077
    Collections
    • Journal Articles (BE) [331]

    MUT Library copyright © 2017-2024  MUT Library Website
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of Research ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    MUT Library copyright © 2017-2024  MUT Library Website
    Contact Us | Send Feedback